KNOWLEDGE / Publication / POST
August 7, 2019
Abstract:

Scientific Presentation made on June 2019 at the Promoting Statistical Insight Conference, London, United-Kingdom.

There is a continuous growth in data collected in clinical trials. Many of those patient’s characteristics
are potential confounding factors. Ideally, these factors should be accounted for in the randomization process to balance study arms and reduce the variability of the estimated treatment effect. However, the efficiency of the randomization decreases very fast with the number of factors, in particular when
the sample size is not very large. Furthermore, balancing for multiple covariates may not account for
their multivariate effects. The purpose of this talk is to present a machine learning solution to improve
high-dimensional randomization.

Our solution comes from the observation that a good randomization does not require balancing all
covariates individually. The problem is to balance patients while considering all covariate effects together. However, those multivariate interactions are difficult to model/estimate with a limited sample size. To solve this issue, we propose to estimate them a priori within a composite covariate. Such composite covariate could be learned with machine learning on historical data from similar studies.
Then, even in small studies, a covariate adaptive randomization could be applied on this single
composite covariate to account for them all.

The composite covariate approach was first presented at the 2018 PSI conference in the context of adjusted analyses. Extending our results to covariate-adaptive randomization, we showed its particular interest with complex data (high-dimensional, non-linear, etc). Indeed, limiting the number of covariates to one has a direct positive impact on the efficiency of the randomization. We also put this
efficiency gain into perspective with the quality of the learning process.

Type:
Scientific Presentation
Authors:
Samuel Branders, PhD; Guillaume Bernard, PhD; Alvaro Pereira, PhD
Date:
June 1, 2019
Conference:
Promoting Statistical Insight Conference
File:

Authors

Related content

Publication

Correcting For The Individual Patient Regression To The Mean Effect

Often, the primary endpoint of RCTs is defined as a change from baseline of a continuous outcome. In…

Type: Scientific Poster
Authors: Samuel Branders, PhD; Guillaume Bernard, PhD; Alvaro Pereira, PhD
Conference: American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Read More
Publication

Do Environmental Parameters Influence The Prediction Of The Placebo Response?

This proof-of-concept study on peripheral neuropathic pain patients investigates the potential influence of the investigator on the placebo…

Read More
Publication

Bayesian Modeling Of The Placebo Response In Neuropathic Pain

In analgesia randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the magnitude and the variability of the placebo response have a negative…

Type: Scientific Poster
Authors: Samuel Branders, PhD; Alvaro Pereira, PhD; Frederic Clermont, PhD; Chantal Gossuin; Dominique Demolle, PhD
Conference: Promoting Statistical Insight Conference
Read More

Understand patient differences in your next clinical trial

Increase clinical trial success rates and get new therapies to patients faster. Tell us about your clinical trial below and we'll be in touch.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.